Adoption/Consumption/Usage - So what's the difference?
Find more posts tagged with
Comments
Sort by:
1 - 3 of
31
- Adoption
- Consumption
- Usage
- Anything else?!
Hey @Matt Myszkowski--
I think @Morgan Pottruff nailed it. I would only add that adoption results from successful change management, a fact commonly overlooked in Customer Success.
It's been said that the definition of insanity is doing things the same old way and expecting a different result. This describes what our teams do most of the time, namely, helping customers change what they do every day by using new technology, thereby delivering better results.
The problem is that people naturally resist change because they perceive loss (of control, status, certainty, even relationships) in giving up the 'old way.' Their brains must also suppress their old, entrenched habits and learn new ones, a process that requires a great deal of attention, effort, and time, none of which people have in abundance. According to Prosci, this human process is predictable and manageable: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement (ADKAR). They also say that companies that manage the 'people' side of change are 6x more likely to achieve project goals.
So in my view adoption leads to usage, which leads to process improvement, which leads to financial improvement.
I think @Morgan Pottruff nailed it. I would only add that adoption results from successful change management, a fact commonly overlooked in Customer Success.
It's been said that the definition of insanity is doing things the same old way and expecting a different result. This describes what our teams do most of the time, namely, helping customers change what they do every day by using new technology, thereby delivering better results.
The problem is that people naturally resist change because they perceive loss (of control, status, certainty, even relationships) in giving up the 'old way.' Their brains must also suppress their old, entrenched habits and learn new ones, a process that requires a great deal of attention, effort, and time, none of which people have in abundance. According to Prosci, this human process is predictable and manageable: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement (ADKAR). They also say that companies that manage the 'people' side of change are 6x more likely to achieve project goals.
So in my view adoption leads to usage, which leads to process improvement, which leads to financial improvement.
Hi Matt,
Here's my take:
Usage - specifies a manner in which the user is consuming the product.
Adoption - The amount of skill and expertise the user has developed, the extent to which the user has integrated the product into their workflow, and is able to leverage your technology to achieve tangible results.
Usage does not equal adoption.
Usage can in some cases "imply" or predict adoption, especially if the nature of the usage implies an advanced understanding or workflow.
Morgan Pottruff
Making technology easy for people
Making technology easy for people
Education | E-Learning | Live and Virtual Events
Let's start the debate!
Cheers, Matt
Heather Leventry
https://www.linkedin.com/in/heatherleventry/