Hi All - We are trying to move away from expansion quotas for our Enterprise CSMs. Apart from renewa

Manan Joshi
Manan Joshi Member Posts: 11 Contributor
edited July 2020 in Strategy & Planning

 

Tagged:

Comments

  • gurd3v
    gurd3v Member Posts: 70 Expert
    Third Anniversary Photogenic
    edited July 2020

    Someone from the GGR community (and I'm pretty sure it was either @Jay Nathan  or @Jeff Breunsbach) posted about the roles in CS depending on the industry size of your customer. 

    In enterprise, I remember the diagram showing that there could be a role specific to expansion, separate from CSM as the CSM is responsible for adoption and customer satisfaction. 

    I just spent the last 15 minutes digging for the diagram - no luck. Will try to find it later today. Hopefully someone else in the community knows what I'm talking about!

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Navigator
    Third Anniversary 10 Comments Photogenic 5 Insightfuls
    edited July 2020

    Couple of resources here, @Gurdev Anand. Were any of these what you were looking for? 

    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
    image
  • gurd3v
    gurd3v Member Posts: 70 Expert
    Third Anniversary Photogenic
    edited July 2020

    YES! Mixed Touch vs High Touch vs Low Touch was what I was referring to. 

    The others are just awesome resources that I'll be saving for when I need em. Thanks for sending all these over!

  • Manan Joshi
    Manan Joshi Member Posts: 11 Contributor
    edited July 2020

    Thanks @Jay Nathan 

  • Matt Myszkowski
    Matt Myszkowski Member Posts: 143 Expert
    100 Comments Second Anniversary Photogenic
    edited July 2020

    Great images courtesy of @Jay Nathan 

    He won't be surprised for me to add this. For me, your high-touch, Enterprise CSMs should be tasked & measured on delivering outcomes for their customers. Ideally these outcomes are measured as a financial value as that will be the most impactful for your customers. Without knowing your software/service, I am sure it (ideally) addresses a business problem so the outcome should be how it addresses that problem, and the benefit of that.

  • Steve Bernstein
    Steve Bernstein Member Posts: 133 Expert
    Third Anniversary 100 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited July 2020

    While "Outcomes" are the ideal measure, they are often too late (lagging) to drive performance improvement. You'll want a good mixture of leading and lagging indicators, with your leading measures focused on process adoption/compliance so you know they are headed in the direction. The key process we see for Enterprise CSMs is RELATIONSHIP building... how deep and wide are the relationships that the CSM has managing, and are they extending their "footprint" within the account to engage all the right stakeholders?  We often see CSMs single-threading contact through their "champion" at the expense of building good bench-strength across the account. We have an awesomely detailed "cookbook" that describes this process in more detail, with templates that accelerate your implementation of this important process, at https://waypointgroup.org/whitepapers/silver-bullet-customer-health-scoring/

  • David Ellin
    David Ellin Member Posts: 170 Expert
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited July 2020

    Adding on to @Steve Bernstein's thoughts on leading indicators, I'd add engagement - participation in case studies, testimonials, referrals, co-hosting/speaking on webinars, etc. If your CSM is doing a good job keeping customers engaged in other ways than simply using your products, that's a good sign they're happy, evangelists, and not going to churn.

  • Chrissy Hines
    Chrissy Hines Member Posts: 11 Contributor
    edited July 2020

    All great details, thanks for sharing everyone! And thanks @Jay Nathan again for that detailed insight.